Welcome to Oaksterdam News Online
Home
Adjust Text -
mz-sign-2_135.jpg
Log-in
Log-in
Main Menu
Home
Contact us
Advertise
Advertisers
Advocacy
Media Gallery
O'dam Map
State Laws
Sitemap
Tours
Case Closet
Lost Activists
Magazines
Volume 1
Volume 2
Volume 3
Volume 4
V4 Issue 1
Oaksterdam News Patient Services Directory
zimmer_t The Men's Wearhouse George Zimmer
O'dam University
Oaksterdam University in the News!!!
nbc_san_jose.jpg NBC Bay Area airs OU story
cnbc.jpg CNBC covers OU!
current.jpg CurrentTV covers OU!
fox_news.jpg FOX News covers OU
ktvu.jpg KTVU coverage of OU
bulldog.jpg The Bulldog Band
norml.jpg 2006 NORML Footage
More  Video Clips  >>  OU in the News!
Polls
Do You Use Cannabis for Medical or Responsible Adult Use?
 
Is The Price of Cannabis Too High?
 
Would You Want A Forum or Two Added To This Site?
 
Which of The Following Forums Would You Be Interested In?
 
Weekly Cannabis Consumption
 
Get Firefox!
Oakland ballot measures pass easily PDF Print E-mail
Written by Matthai Kuruvila, Chronicle Staff Writer   
Saturday, 25 July 2009

Matthai Kuruvila, Chronicle Staff Writer
Wednesday, July 22, 2009

OAKLAND, CALIF. -- Oakland voters overwhelmingly approved four ballot measures in an unusual mail-only election Tuesday that sought to ease the city's tight budget situation.

All four measures passed with at least 71 percent of the vote, with well over 90 percent of the ballots counted. Measure F's creation of a business license tax for cannabis businesses got approval from 79.9 percent of voters, the highest of any measure.

The measures featured an eclectic set of issues, ranging from Measure F to Measure D's restructuring of funding for children's programs.

But the stakes were high.

Despite having slashed $83 million in jobs, services and other expenses to come up with a $414 million budget for the fiscal year that began July 1, the city had staked at least $7 million on the premise that voters would pass these four measures.

The election was scheduled off the election cycle, city leaders say, so that they could adjust to voters' decisions as quickly as possible. But by having a special election and doing it solely by mail, voter turnout was bound to be low.

Of the city's 204,000 voters, roughly 23 percent - or 47,424 voters - had mailed in their ballots and were counted in Tuesday's results.

In contrast, the November presidential election drew 80 percent of Oakland voters, Alameda County Registrar of Voters Dave Macdonald said. The June 2006 election, which featured the Oakland mayoral race, drew 39 percent of voters.

The four ballot measures were also striking in that they required no new taxes from the vast majority of residents. And the parties that were taxed were often in support.

Measure C, which would raise the hotel tax to fund the convention center and tourism-related venues, was supported by hotels. Measure F's cannabis business license tax was put forth by cannabis businesses as a way to gain legitimacy.

But Measure H, which clarified that corporations had to pay property transfer taxes on buildings acquired as part of mergers and acquisitions, was opposed by the Oakland Metropolitan Chamber of Commerce, which said it would prevent businesses from locating in the city.

Ballot measures

Measure C: Raises hotel tax by 3 points, to 14 percent, to fund the convention center, zoo, Oakland Museum and Chabot Space and Science Center. Passed, 76.6 to 23.3 percent.

Measure D: Modifies last year's Measure OO, which requires a percentage of city general fund for children's programs. Reduces $15.1 million in funding this year by $3.7 million. Passed, 71.5 to 28.5 percent.

Measure F: Would tax gross receipts of all "cannabis businesses" at 1.8 percent. Expected to generate $294,000 annually. Passed, 79.9 to 20.1 percent.

Measure H:
Ensures that property transfer taxes be applied in corporate ownership changes. Passed, 74.6 to 25.4 percent.

E-mail Matthai Kuruvila at This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it

This article appeared on page A - 13 of the San Francisco Chronicle
Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/07/22/MNS918SQL4.DTL

Last Updated ( Saturday, 25 July 2009 )
 
< Prev   Next >



animated_logo_4_20_05