Prohibitionists scare people with comparisons between marijuana and
tobacco smoke. Tobacco smoke is bad, therefore all smoke is bad the
reasoning goes. If somebody suggested that burning PCBs (dioxin), high
sulphur coal, firewood, nuclear waste and natural gas all produced the
same combustion products and all were equally dangerous, most people
would demand proof before accepting such a ridiculous claim. But make
the claim that tobacco smoke and pot smoke are equally bad and no one
questions it. But what does science say.......
There is one very
important difference between marijuana smoke and tobacco smoke. Tobacco
smoke contains ionizing radiation and cannabis smoke does not. The
tobacco plant's roots and the sticky leaf surface absorb radioactive
polonium-210 and lead-210 isotopes which are inhaled with tobacco
smoke. A pack and a half a day smoker receives a daily dose of
radiation equal to what a person would have received standing downwind
from Three Mile Island nuclear reactor during the first 21 hours after
the infamous accident. Pack and a half a day smokers are exposed to the
equivalent of over 300 hundred chest x-rays every year from this
ionizing radiation.
Radioactivity in tobacco may explain why
smokers of low-tar and low-nicotine cigarettes have the same lung
cancer rate as smokers of regular cigarettes. 50% of tobacco radiation
is discharged into the air which might explain why non-smokers married
to heavy smokers may have an increased risk of lung cancer. "Americans
are exposed to far more radiation from tobacco smoke than from any
other source," says Dr R T Ravenholt, former director of World health
Surveys at the Center for Disease Control.
It is extremely
misleading to blame tobacco risks on "carcinogens" without accounting
for ionizing radiation. Some experts speculate that combining ionizing
radiation with carcinogenic substances increases cancer risks a
hundredfold. Vilma Hunt, who discovered radioactive polonium 210 in
tobacco in 1964, recalls the day her study was released. It seemed that
every chemist and physicist she knew quit smoking. "They immediately
understood the implication," she recounts. "They said, 'If there's
ionizing radiation in this stuff, that's it. I'm finished'."
Even former Surgeon General C. Everettt Koop admits that radio activity may be the primary cause of lung cancer in smokers Marijuana plants do not absorb radioactive elements.
Where Are The Bodies
If
marijuana caused lung cancer, prohibitionists would be giving body
counts on the six o'clock news instead of peddling scare stories. The
truly sad aspect of this fear mongering is that the authorities KNOW
marijuana is harmless. Back in the 1960s, the drug warriors got to
believing their own propaganda and authorized over 10,000 government
approved studies of marijuana between 1965-75. To their amazement and
disgust, report after report gave cannabis a clean bill of health. Even
worse from the drug crusader point of view, many studies provided
preliminary evidence that cannabis compounds are effective in treating
a wide range of diseases including cancer tumor suppression.
Anti-Cancer Compounds In Cannabis
Another
reason to demand proof before accepting any assumptions about marijuana
causing cancer is the fact that cannabis contains several very active
anti-cancer compounds.
In 1976, Louis S. Harris, of the
Medical College of Virginia, reported that delta-9 THC increased cancer
survival time by 36% without the weight loss caused by most standard
anti-tumor agents. Delta-8 THC and cannabinol were also found to be
quite active in tumor suppression. No other chemotherapy agent
differentiates between tumor and normal cells the way cannabis
compounds do. Like all other studies showing medical potential for
marijuana, Harris's funding was immediately discontinued.
Cannabis Receptors
The
discovery of "cannabis receptors" in the human brain and other parts of
the body and naturally occurring THC compounds (anandamide) in the body
has ended most scientific speculation that the active ingredients in
marijuana cause any kind of health damage. Previous assumptions about
brain damage and other health injuries have been rejected because it is
now known that cannabis is metabolized without any toxicity whatsoever.
Marijuana is safer than public drinking water.
INFORMATION SOURCES:
HEMP & the marijuana conspiracy: The Emperor Wears No Clothes by Jack Herer 1995 p164-5
US Surgeon General's Reports -- 1981 - 1982
Proceedings of The National Academy of Science, Biophysics, and Biological Science, March 1983
Lancet -- September 1983
Would You Still Rather Fight Than Switch? -- Whole Life Times Mid-April/May 1985
Radioactivity: The New Found Danger in Cigarettes, by Lowell Ponte Reader's Digest -- March 1986 p 123
Analgesic & Anti-Tumor potential of The Cannabinoids, Louis S.
Harris, Dept of Pharmacology, Medical College of Virginia, Health
Sciences Div., Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, (US Dept
Health & Ed. partial sponsor) 1976
|