Welcome to Oaksterdam News Online
Home arrow Lost Activists arrow Supreme Court upholds public health rights of States
Adjust Text -
mz-sign-2_135.jpg

Enter Amount:

Log-in
Log-in
Main Menu
Home
Contact us
Advertise
Advertisers
Advocacy
Media Gallery
O'dam Map
State Laws
Sitemap
Tours
Case Closet
Lost Activists
Magazines
Volume 1
Volume 2
Volume 3
Volume 4
V2 Issue 1
V2 Issue 2
V2 Issue 3
V2 Issue 4
V2 Issue 5
Oaksterdam News Patient Services Directory
zimmer_t The Men's Wearhouse George Zimmer
O'dam University
Oaksterdam University in the News!!!
nbc_san_jose.jpg NBC Bay Area airs OU story
cnbc.jpg CNBC covers OU!
current.jpg CurrentTV covers OU!
fox_news.jpg FOX News covers OU
ktvu.jpg KTVU coverage of OU
bulldog.jpg The Bulldog Band
norml.jpg 2006 NORML Footage
More  Video Clips  >>  OU in the News!
Get Firefox!
Supreme Court upholds public health rights of States PDF Print E-mail
Written by Chris Conrad   
Wednesday, 08 February 2006

The US Supreme Court Jan. 17 affirmed the power of States to control their own public health policies, in a 6-3 ruling that upheld Oregon’s Death With Dignity Act. State voters passed the 1997 initiative to legalize physician-assisted suicide for terminal patients.

    The Court focused on the historic role of States in regulating medicine and safeguarding public health. It reaffirmed their power to pursue measures that are novel, controversial or face strong disapproval elsewhere. The Court read the Controlled Substances Act as respecting that role.

BAKERSFIELD ? Nature?s Medicinal and friends celebrated their success in moving the City Council to take a more supportive position regarding local dispensaries. The county is implementing a patient ID card program. Photo by Jaime Galindo
BAKERSFIELD ? Nature?s Medicinal and friends celebrated their success in moving the City Council to take a more supportive position regarding local dispensaries. The county is implementing a patient ID card program. Photo by Jaime Galindo
    Two lower courts also ruled against the Attorney General, but the case made its way to the Supreme Court. The American Public Health Association and the Drug Policy Alliance submitted amicus briefs to the Court, urging it to reject the government’s all-encompassing view of the CSA.

    Justice Clarence Thomas dissented from the decision, saying it is inconsistent to rule against States Rights on medical marijuana, but for them on suicide.



Chris Conrad
About the author:
Staunch supporter of Oaksterdam News


Chris Conrad has studied cannabis (marijuana) since 1988. He has written two books on the topic and contributed to others. Familiar with numerous books and at least 100 scientific studies, such as federal Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and National Institute on Drug Abuse data. Reported on cannabis dispensaries for California legislators. Consults with government agencies. Testified at National Academy of Science, Institute of Medicine hearings. Regularly consults with physicians including some of the world’s foremost authorities on cannabis and patients as to their knowledge and experiences regarding cannabis. 

Read More >>
Last Updated ( Friday, 04 August 2006 )
 
< Prev   Next >



animated_logo_4_20_05